"The God Delusion" of Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins, Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford is one of the leading anti-Christian polemicists on the planet - at least in the sense that he is one of the best-known and most persistent.  His recent book "The God Delusion" has been a best-seller and we hope a review and analysis of it will appear here before too long.   

There are many who have answered his previous well-publicised polemics against religion - but these days those opportunities don't often arise in public as he rarely debates in an open forum.  Alister McGrath, Michael Poole and Denis Alexander are among those who have responded convincingly to Dawkins's published material. 

 

One of the interesting things about Richard Dawkins is that he seems to be in agreement with many of the pioneers of modern science - many of whom were Christians - about one thing in particular.  It is impossible to separate science from what we think about truth more widely: that philosophy, ethics and science should not be seen in isolation from each other.  Some especially helpful material can be found online exploring the way Dawkins builds his arguments at bethinking.org -the article highlighting some glaring examples of fallacious reasoning is well worth a read.

 

In November we ran an event on science with Denis Alexander, the first part of which is available in the audio section of the website.

 

Below, you'll find a video interview with Prof Michael Ruse, an atheist who is not terribly impressed by the God Delusion...

 

 


The trouble with Richard Dawkins from CPX on Vimeo.

Al MacInnes, 19/10/2006

Feedback:
Hugh Manning (Guest)18/03/2009 11:16
Michael Ruse makes a valid point about asking atheists to take believers seriously. However as much as I have tried (attending Faraday Institure lectures, STAG Arena course, Dennis Alexander talk to your church, I find mysely unable to take any of them seriously and indeed cannot even afford them any respect for their beliefs because they seem to shut off their logical minds when they move from scince to religion - it's almost like talking to a brick wall, particularly when many just quote from the bible as evidence for their beliefs. Even the point made by Ruse about the cosmological argument seems to miss the point that believers use the fine tuning of the universe as evidence for God ie his design. Yes, the fine tuning does make our universe pretty remarkable but as Dawkins says " so what - that doesn't prove anything" certainly not that there must be a designer - God has to be pretty remarkable and finely tuned so if you use the argument that a finly tuned universe has to have a designer, so then God has to have a designer and so on ad infinitum!